Sustainable Energy

The Gardens of Paradise would give us all the energy we need if we would choose to live harmoniously.

Basic survival in the US requires exhorbitant amounts of energy, a basic overhead cost which as we do to achieve such little service in regards to survival is phenomenally problematic. W

To consider the sustainability of our energy use requires a closer examination of our habitat and means of meeting our basic needs
way human societies utilize energy to survive must be completely redesigned.

The way "sustainability", "ecological sustainability"

The

"Sustainable" in this sense of ecological sustainability is about whether or not we're using resources within the limits of ecological regeneration… "are we cutting down trees faster than they can grow?" is an oversimplification to the point of being misleading and wrong, in essence you could look at it that way but there are abominablly problematic "un-sustainable" timber plantations which meet the letter of that definition by "harvesting at the rate of regrowth". This needs to be better contextualized: within an ancient forest and divine harmony with the ecosystems, cutting only within this regenerative measure without killing the broader ecosystems or having otherwise adverse affect on the ecosystem.

forestry the simplest way to look at it, and it gets complex when looking at the supply chains of the world.

Few people comprehend the supply chains that must be calculated in order to measure the energetic-ins-and-outs which determine "sustainability", and the leadership of the world demonstrates no care or concern.

Some problems exist:

Electric cars… when car-less villages is what's needed

promoting electric cars "green" "eco" is delusional … nothing of the electrical grid charging the cars is sustainable, nothing of the manufacturing lifecycle is sustainable, "delusion" in this case is true, this is a terribly problematic notion

Problem one: "greenwash"

With products to sell, the word "sustainable" is applied as a "positive attribute" in the advertisement and labels/packaging and such to con people into buying the product rather than to accurately describe the products of products. There's a spectrum of fraudulence in this area, from baseless claims of "eco-sustainable-whatever" to claims whose quantitavive improvement is too insignificant for the qualitative
fraudulently, to describe a product whose lifecycle is simple not sustainable. "Heat pumps" are one instance of product that gets hyped as "eco-friendly" in a market of "sustainable technologies", while it simply shouldn't even exist. "Heat pumps" exist because manufacturers want to sell products and consumers don't know any better. The production and operation of these products called "heat pumps" (sometimes geothermal heatpumps) is so far from actually being a sustainable energy solution that it's absurd. Consumerism, as such, the profit-seeking push of products to consumers, is simply not sustainable by pattern. "Greenwash" is the term to websearch for examples of this problem.

Problem two: inadequacy

When not blatantly fraudulent, "sustainable" technologies are often "less bad" terrWhile heatpumps aren't something as utiliHeatpumps here

What sustainability actually looks like in terms of energy

Energy. Power.

Intelligence and togetherness make it so sticks give us

Getting heat without burning anything
Growin